Ashby vs Lever: What You Need To Know (2025)

With many companies debating between Ashby and Lever, we’re here to break it down.

HR teams typically prioritize three major factors when selecting an ATS:

1. Powerful candidate sourcing tools.
2. Efficient applicant tracking capabilities.
3. Comprehensive data and reporting insights.
   

For developer hiring, an ATS should remove bottlenecks, improve engagement, and streamline decision-making.

At Remote Crew, we understand how important it is to pick an ATS that aligns with your hiring goals and optimizes your recruitment process.

Do you find yourself...

• Struggling to organize candidates effectively?
• Having trouble finding highly skilled developers?
• Wishing you had better hiring data at your fingertips?
  

If any of these challenges sound familiar, you’re not alone. Many businesses grapple with choosing the right ATS.

This article is for you if you are a...

• Recruiter looking for an efficient and data-driven hiring solution.
• Engineering manager expanding a development team.
• Business leader focused on streamlining recruitment.
  

Table Of Contents:

• Ashby vs Lever: Feature Comparison
• Candidate Sourcing Features
• Applicant Tracking Features
• Interviewer Experience
• Reporting
• Integrations
• Pricing
• Ashby vs Lever: Which Should You Choose?

Ashby vs Lever: Feature Comparison

Here’s a quick breakdown of how these two platforms compare:

Candidate Sourcing Features

Ashby

Ashby leverages AI to automate sourcing and engagement. It integrates with LinkedIn, allowing recruiters to automate outreach and refine candidate targeting based on experience.

Lever

Lever provides a CRM-based approach, offering structured email campaigns and tracking. The Chrome extension helps collect LinkedIn candidate data easily.

Winner: Ashby for AI-powered sourcing and automation capabilities.

Applicant Tracking Features

Ashby

Ashby offers highly customizable dashboards, workflow automation, and in-depth analytics that help recruiters track hiring progress efficiently.

Lever

Lever provides an intuitive drag-and-drop system that makes pipeline management seamless. However, it lacks Ashby’s depth in data-driven insights.

Winner: Ashby for its custom workflows and powerful analytics.

Interviewer Experience

Ashby

Ashby enhances hiring collaboration with structured feedback templates and customizable evaluation tools. AI-backed insights help hiring managers make better decisions.

Lever

Lever simplifies interviewer feedback with intuitive forms and notes. While easy to use, it doesn’t offer the same flexibility in structuring evaluation processes.

Winner: Ashby for its structured and customizable interview process.

Reporting

Ashby

Ashby delivers advanced analytics, including pass-through rates, custom hiring dashboards, and real-time tracking of recruitment performance.

Lever

Lever provides solid reporting features with pre-built templates and Slack alerts. While useful, it lacks Ashby’s depth and flexibility in data analysis.

Winner: Ashby for its superior analytics and real-time tracking.

Integrations

Ashby

Ashby integrates with Deel, LinkedIn, and technical screening platforms. Its flexible API allows for extensive custom integrations.

Lever

Lever connects with Slack, HackerRank, and essential HR tools. However, its integration options are less extensive than Ashby’s.

Winner: Ashby for its extensive and adaptable integration network.

Pricing

Ashby

Ashby starts at $9,500 per year, making it a premium option designed for scaling businesses needing advanced analytics and automation.

Lever

Lever starts at $4,000 per year, making it a more budget-friendly solution for smaller teams that need a streamlined ATS.

Winner: Lever for affordability, but Ashby offers more robust long-term functionality.

Ashby vs Lever: Which Should You Choose?

You now have a clearer comparison of these two ATS platforms.

• Choose Ashby if you need AI-powered sourcing, deep analytics, and highly customizable automation.
• Go with Lever if you're looking for a more affordable, CRM-focused ATS with an intuitive pipeline.
• Both tools cater to different recruitment needs and business sizes.
  

The right ATS depends on your hiring complexity, automation preferences, and budget. If you’re unsure which system best supports your developer hiring strategy, we can help.

Contact Remote Crew today to find the ATS that aligns with your developer hiring needs. We’ll guide you through selection, implementation, and optimization to ensure hiring success.